DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercury Mountaineer vs 1992 Ford Bronco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelBronco
1996Model year1992
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
218 HPPower188 HP
391 NmTorque366 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank121 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4663 mm
1875 mmWidth2009 mm
1830 mmHeight1892 mm
1950 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase2659 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercury Mountaineer and 1992 Ford Bronco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…