2012 • Ford
B-Max
Ford B-Max 1.6 Duratec (105 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Ford B-Max vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 D2 (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford B-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolvo S40
FordMakeVolvo
B-MaxModelS40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolvo S40
12,1 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
105 HPPower115 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 PowerShiftGears6
195/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolvo S40
4077 mmLength4476 mm
1751 mmWidth1770 mm
1604 mmHeight1454 mm
1234 KgWeight1383 Kg
2489 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford B-Max and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford B-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…