2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 D2 (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Ford B-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Ford
B-Max
Ford B-Max 1.6 Duratec (105 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford B-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationFord B-Max
VolvoMakeFord
S40ModelB-Max
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationFord B-Max
11,4 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
270 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationFord B-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationFord B-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 PowerShift
—Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationFord B-Max
4476 mmLength4077 mm
1770 mmWidth1751 mm
1454 mmHeight1604 mm
1383 KgWeight1234 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2489 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Ford B-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford B-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…