2016 • Ford
B-Max
Ford B-Max 1.0 EcoBoost (100 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Ford B-Max vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.3 JTDm (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Ford B-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford B-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
FordMakeAlfa Romeo
B-MaxModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford B-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
13,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
170 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford B-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford B-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford B-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
4077 mmLength4063 mm
1751 mmWidth1720 mm
1604 mmHeight1446 mm
1199 KgWeight1150 Kg
2489 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford B-Max and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford B-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…