1990 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.9 i XR 4x4 (150 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Ford Sierra vs 1990 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford SierraSpecificationFord Aerostar
FordMakeFord
SierraModelAerostar
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford SierraSpecificationFord Aerostar
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2933 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
229 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford SierraSpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford SierraSpecificationFord Aerostar
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford SierraSpecificationFord Aerostar
4425 mmLength4440 mm
1694 mmWidth1820 mm
1407 mmHeight1850 mm
—Weight1530 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Ford Sierra and 1990 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…