1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
1990 Ford Aerostar vs 1990 Alfa Romeo 75 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Alfa Romeo
75
Alfa Romeo 75 3.0 V6 (192 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford AerostarSpecificationAlfa Romeo 75
FordMakeAlfa Romeo
AerostarModel75
1990Model year1990
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford AerostarSpecificationAlfa Romeo 75
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
160 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
147 HPPower192 HP
224 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford AerostarSpecificationAlfa Romeo 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank68 lt
16 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford AerostarSpecificationAlfa Romeo 75
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford AerostarSpecificationAlfa Romeo 75
4440 mmLength4420 mm
1820 mmWidth1660 mm
1850 mmHeight1400 mm
1530 KgWeight1300 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2510 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Ford Aerostar and 1990 Alfa Romeo 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…