2016 • Fiat
Toro
Fiat Toro 2.0 Multijet (170 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.0 D4 (190 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Fiat Toro
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo XC90
FiatMakeVolvo
ToroModelXC90
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo XC90
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
170 HPPower190 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/70 R16; 225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo XC90
4915 mmLength4950 mm
1844 mmWidth—
1746 mmHeight1776 mm
1709 KgWeight—
2990 mmWheelbase2984 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…