DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo V40
FiatMakeVolvo
ToroModelV40
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo V40
—0–100 km/h7,4 s
190 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
170 HPPower190 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/70 R16; 225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Fiat ToroSpecificationVolvo V40
4915 mmLength4369 mm
1844 mmWidth1857 mm
1746 mmHeight1439 mm
1709 KgWeight—
2990 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…