DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Mini Clubman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMini
ToroModelClubman
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,3 s
190 km/hTop speed238 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
170 HPPower231 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/70 R16; 225/65 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4915 mmLength4253 mm
1844 mmWidth1800 mm
1746 mmHeight1441 mm
1709 KgWeight1475 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…