2003 • Alpina
B10
Alpina B10 4.8 i V8 32V (375 Hp) 2003Overall Score82.5/100
2003 Alpina B10 vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 32V Cobra (324 Hp) 2005Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Alpina B10
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B10SpecificationFord Mustang
AlpinaMakeFord
B10ModelMustang
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Alpina B10SpecificationFord Mustang
5,4 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
284 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4837 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
375 HPPower324 HP
510 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B10SpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B10SpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B10SpecificationFord Mustang
4775 mmLength4653 mm
1800 mmWidth1857 mm
1415 mmHeight1350 mm
1690 KgWeight1615 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Alpina B10 and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…