DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2003 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAlpina
MustangModelB10
2005Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
240 km/hTop speed284 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4837 cc
324 HPPower375 HP
430 NmTorque510 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R17Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4775 mm
1857 mmWidth1800 mm
1350 mmHeight1415 mm
1615 KgWeight1690 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2003 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…