DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Proton Saga vs 2016 Fiat Tipo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tipo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ProtonMakeFiat
SagaModelTipo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
120 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption4,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4331 mmLength4368 mm
1689 mmWidth1792 mm
1491 mmHeight1495 mm
1035 KgWeight1365 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2638 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Proton Saga and 2016 Fiat Tipo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tipo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…