2000 • AC
Aceca
AC Aceca 4.6 i V8 32V (326 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
2000 AC Aceca vs 1999 Alpina B10 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Alpina
B10
Alpina B10 4.6 i V8 32V (347 Hp) 1999Overall Score81.5/100
WINNER
AC Aceca
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B10
ACMakeAlpina
AcecaModelB10
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B10
6,1 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
250 km/hTop speed269 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
326 HPPower347 HP
427 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B10
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B10
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R18Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B10
4660 mmLength4805 mm
1890 mmWidth1800 mm
1340 mmHeight1420 mm
1615 KgWeight1800 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 AC Aceca and 1999 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…