DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Alpina B10 vs 2000 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeAlpina
B10ModelB10
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
269 km/hTop speed269 km/h
4619 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
347 HPPower347 HP
480 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
19,4 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,3 ltAverage consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4805 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1800 KgWeight1800 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Alpina B10 and 2000 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…