2003 • Fiat
Stilo
Fiat Stilo 1.8 16V (3 dr) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Fiat Stilo vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZT
MG ZT 1.8 i 16V Turbo (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat StiloSpecificationMG ZT
FiatMakeMG
StiloModelZT
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Fiat StiloSpecificationMG ZT
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
202 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
133 HPPower160 HP
162 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat StiloSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat StiloSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat StiloSpecificationMG ZT
4180 mmLength4740 mm
1785 mmWidth1780 mm
1475 mmHeight1410 mm
1240 KgWeight1440 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Fiat Stilo and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…