DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Fiat Fullback vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMazda
FullbackModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
Pick UpBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
169 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2191 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5285 mmLength4550 mm
1785 mmWidth1840 mm
1775 mmHeight1680 mm
1870 kgWeight1535 Kg
960 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2700 mm

Additional Features

Fiat FullbackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Mazda CX-5

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Fiat Fullback and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…