DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda 6 vs 2017 Fiat Fullback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
6ModelFullback
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
210 km/hTop speed169 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength5285 mm
1840 mmWidth1785 mm
1450 mmHeight1775 mm
1485-1568 KgWeight1870 kg
—Luggage capacity960 lt
2830 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda 6

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat FullbackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda 6 and 2017 Fiat Fullback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…