1996 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.8 (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda 626 vs 1996 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
MazdaMakeFiat
626ModelCroma
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
90 HPPower94 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
—Length4520 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1430 mm
—Weight1240 Kg
—Wheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda 626 and 1996 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…