DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Audi 80 vs 1993 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Croma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFiat Croma
AudiMakeFiat
80ModelCroma
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFiat Croma
13,6 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
90 HPPower94 HP
148 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFiat Croma
4482 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1406 mmHeight1430 mm
1190 KgWeight1240 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Audi 80 and 1993 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…