DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Fiat Croma vs 1992 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeOpel
CromaModelOmega
1993Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
180 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
94 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4740 mm
1760 mmWidth1760 mm
1430 mmHeight1445 mm
1240 KgWeight1235 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Fiat Croma and 1992 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…