DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Fiat Croma vs 1993 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Croma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat CromaSpecificationAudi 80
FiatMakeAudi
CromaModel80
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Fiat CromaSpecificationAudi 80
12,5 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
180 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
94 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat CromaSpecificationAudi 80
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat CromaSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Fiat CromaSpecificationAudi 80
4520 mmLength4482 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1406 mm
1240 KgWeight1190 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Fiat Croma and 1993 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…