2008 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.9 MultiJet (120 Hp) 2008Overall Score60.25/100
2008 Fiat Bravo vs 2008 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.8 i 16V (125) 2008Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo C30
FiatMakeVolvo
BravoModelC30
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo C30
10,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
255 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo C30
4336 mmLength4252 mm
1792 mmWidth1782 mm
1498 mmHeight1447 mm
1320 KgWeight1279 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Fiat Bravo and 2008 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…