2008 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.8 i 16V (125) 2008Overall Score59.5/100
2008 Volvo C30 vs 2008 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.9 MultiJet (120 Hp) 2008Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
VolvoMakeFiat
C30ModelBravo
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
11,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
200 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
4252 mmLength4336 mm
1782 mmWidth1792 mm
1447 mmHeight1498 mm
1279 KgWeight1320 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Volvo C30 and 2008 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…