DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Fiat Bravo vs 2008 Suzuki Forenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeSuzuki
BravoModelForenza
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
120 HPPower127 HP
255 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength—
1792 mmWidth—
1498 mmHeight—
1320 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Fiat Bravo and 2008 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…