DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Fiat Bravo vs 2002 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeSuzuki
BravoModelVitara
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
100 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4030 mm
1755 mmWidth1630 mm
1420 mmHeight1695 mm
1145 KgWeight1405 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Fiat Bravo and 2002 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…