DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Baleno vs 2002 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFiat
BalenoModelBravo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
160 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
75 HPPower100 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4025 mm
1690 mmWidth1755 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1030 KgWeight1145 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Baleno and 2002 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…