DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda Verisa vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Verisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
VerisaModelBravo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
140 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4336 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1530 mmHeight1498 mm
1100 KgWeight1320 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda Verisa and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Verisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…