DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Great Wall Florid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Florid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeGreat Wall
BravoModelFlorid
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
300 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4336 mmLength3907 mm
1792 mmWidth1694 mm
1498 mmHeight1521 mm
1320 KgWeight1195 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2368 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Great Wall Florid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Florid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…