2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 MultiAir (140 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationFord Kuga
FiatMakeFord
BravoModelKuga
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationFord Kuga
8,9 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationFord Kuga
4336 mmLength4524 mm
1792 mmWidth1838 mm
1498 mmHeight1702 mm
1275 KgWeight1580 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…