2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 MultiAir (140 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Bravo
FordMakeFiat
KugaModelBravo
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Bravo
9,7 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
240 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Bravo
4524 mmLength4336 mm
1838 mmWidth1792 mm
1702 mmHeight1498 mm
1580 KgWeight1275 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…