2010 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 (90 Hp) 2010Overall Score50.25/100
2010 Fiat Bravo vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.4 CD (68 Hp) 2010Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 2
FiatMakeMazda
BravoModel2
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 2
12,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
179 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
128 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 2
4336 mmLength3900 mm
1792 mmWidth1695 mm
1498 mmHeight1475 mm
1205 KgWeight975 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2490 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Fiat Bravo and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…