DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2015 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
MiToModelGalaxy
2014Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4/5Seats5/7
3Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
219 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4848 mm
1720 mmWidth1916 mm
1446 mmHeight1747 mm
1170 KgWeight1633 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2849 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2015 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…