DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Galaxy vs 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAlfa Romeo
GalaxyModelMiTo
2015Model year2014
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
195 km/hTop speed219 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4848 mmLength4063 mm
1916 mmWidth1720 mm
1747 mmHeight1446 mm
1633 KgWeight1170 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Galaxy and 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…