DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Fiat Albea vs 2012 Chery Kimo (A1) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Albea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeChery
AlbeaModelKimo (A1)
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
70 HPPower83 HP
180 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
14Tyre size175/60 R14
NoABS—

Dimensions

4186 mmLength3700 mm
1703 mmWidth1578 mm
1490 mmHeight1527 mm
1085 kgWeight1070 Kg
515 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Fiat Albea and 2012 Chery Kimo (A1) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Albea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…