-2012-Teknik-Ozellikleri.jpg)
2012 • Chery
Kimo (A1)
Chery Kimo (A1) 1.3i (83 Hp) 2012Overall Score59.25/100
2012 Chery Kimo (A1) vs 2012 Fiat Albea Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Fiat
Albea
Fiat Albea Premio Plus 2012 1.3 Multijet 70 HPOverall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Albea
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationFiat Albea
CheryMakeFiat
Kimo (A1)ModelAlbea
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationFiat Albea
—0–100 km/h14,5 s
156 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
83 HPPower70 HP
114 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationFiat Albea
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption6,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationFiat Albea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/60 R14Tyre size14
—ABSNo
Dimensions
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationFiat Albea
3700 mmLength4186 mm
1578 mmWidth1703 mm
1527 mmHeight1490 mm
1070 KgWeight1085 kg
—Luggage capacity515 lt
2390 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Chery Kimo (A1) and 2012 Fiat Albea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Albea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…