DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAudi
MiToModelQ3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
209 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
140 HPPower125 HP
250 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size215/65 R16; 235/55 R17; 235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4388 mm
1720 mmWidth1831 mm
1446 mmHeight1608 mm
1170 KgWeight1385 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…