DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2015 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeChevrolet
MiToModelTrax
2014Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
209 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
250 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4248 mm
1720 mmWidth1776 mm
1446 mmHeight1674 mm
1170 KgWeight1380 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2015 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…