DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Chevrolet Trax vs 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAlfa Romeo
TraxModelMiTo
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
195 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4063 mm
1776 mmWidth1720 mm
1674 mmHeight1446 mm
1380 KgWeight1170 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Chevrolet Trax and 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…