DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Pro Cee'd

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeKia
MiToModelPro Cee'd
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
140 HPPower135 HP
250 NmTorque164 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4310 mm
1720 mmWidth1780 mm
1446 mmHeight1430 mm
1170 KgWeight1369 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Pro Cee'd leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…