DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeAlfa Romeo
OptimaModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
4Doors3

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
202 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
325 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4063 mm
1830 mmWidth1720 mm
1455 mmHeight1446 mm
1500 KgWeight1170 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…