DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeKia
MiToModelOptima
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4/5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
209 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
250 NmTorque325 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4845 mm
1720 mmWidth1830 mm
1446 mmHeight1455 mm
1170 KgWeight1500 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…