DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
MiToModelKuga
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
209 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4524 mm
1720 mmWidth1838 mm
1446 mmHeight1702 mm
1170 KgWeight1580 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…