DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Chevrolet Orlando Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeChevrolet
MiToModelOrlando
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4/5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
120 HPPower140 HP
206 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4652 mm
1720 mmWidth1836 mm
1446 mmHeight1633 mm
1145/1197 KgWeight1539 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Chevrolet Orlando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…