DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Skoda Superb vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeAlfa Romeo
SuperbModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
LiftbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
4/5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
201 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
200 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4063 mm
1783 mmWidth1720 mm
1461 mmHeight1446 mm
1425 KgWeight1145/1197 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Skoda Superb and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…