DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2012 Hyundai i40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeHyundai
MiToModeli40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2/3Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
155 HPPower140 HP
230 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4060 mmLength4815 mm
1720 mmWidth1815 mm
1440 mmHeight1470 mm
1145 KgWeight1530 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2012 Hyundai i40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…