DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Hyundai i40 vs 2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeAlfa Romeo
i40ModelMiTo
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors2/3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
140 HPPower155 HP
324 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4815 mmLength4060 mm
1815 mmWidth1720 mm
1470 mmHeight1440 mm
1530 KgWeight1145 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Hyundai i40 and 2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…