DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 FAW Vita vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Vita

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMitsubishi
VitaModelLancer
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
178 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
130 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4245 mmLength4485 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1500 mmHeight1480 mm
1020 KgWeight1360 Kg
2425 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 FAW Vita and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Vita leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…