DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 FAW City Golf vs 2000 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW City Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeAudi
City GolfModelA2
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,6 s
167 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
125 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 STyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3985 mmLength3826 mm
1665 mmWidth1673 mm
1415 mmHeight1553 mm
1001 KgWeight1095 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 FAW City Golf and 2000 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW City Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…