DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Combo vs 2000 FAW City Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW City Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFAW
ComboModelCity Golf
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
165 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank47 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength3985 mm
1686 mmWidth1665 mm
1805 mmHeight1415 mm
—Weight1001 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Combo and 2000 FAW City Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW City Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…