DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 FAW Besturn X80 vs 2017 Renault Talisman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeRenault
Besturn X80ModelTalisman
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
198 km/hTop speed231 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
186 HPPower200 HP
235 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 EDC
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4866 mm
1820 mmWidth1870 mm
1695 mmHeight1465 mm
1610 KgWeight—
2675 mmWheelbase2809 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 FAW Besturn X80 and 2017 Renault Talisman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…